George Osborne is the politician’s politician: a strategist and gifted tactician. There are little clues to the ways he constantly tends the political garden he cultivates. The chancellor handwrote ‘thank you’ letters to the key Tories who played a role in last month’s astonishingly successful local election night. Osborne thanked them for the contribution they made, which he termed a “tremendous achievement”.
Few frontline politicians remember the workers in the wake of a triumph. These are the touches that go down well and inspire loyalty among the troops. Osborne has finally learned the importance of making allies. It is this attention to detail in the politics of things that makes Osborne such a powerful political friend to David Cameron and foe to Labour.
And gossip. Like all great politicians, he hoovers up political chatter. Knowledge is power and those who succeed always have a handle on what’s being said about whom.
Osborne is master of two briefs. He is the chancellor. And he is the Conservative Party’s political brain. Both are vital roles. His relationship with his long-term friend the prime minister remains deeply loyal and firm. They speak constantly and they text one another. In meetings the chancellor invariably dreams up the solution and the tactical implementation. He has already enjoyed the kind of stellar career most politicians could only dream of, and yet he has only just celebrated his 40th birthday.
The coalition government is run by the ‘quad’ – David Cameron, Osborne, Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander. Osborne invariably chairs this meeting of the most senior officials and advisers because of his political skills. The key figures he listens to are Matt Hancock, the youthful MP for West Suffolk, and his partner in crime, the elegant Rupert Harrison. On the official side, principal private secretary Dan Rosenfield has recently quit the civil service to take a lucrative job in banking. He is replaced by Beth Russell, the very capable Treasury brain who worked closely with Gordon Brown. Pals say this shows how Osborne is happy to work with anyone as long as they’re good. Indeed, both he and predecessor Alistair Darling spoke at Rosenfield’s discreet leaving party in the sumptuous rooms of 11 Downing Street.
Osborne splits his day between Number 11 and the Treasury. The day begins in Downing Street. He is surrounded by portraits of Gladstone and Disraeli along with family photographs.
Officials had to procure new laptops after moving in only to discover just one working computer in Number 11. The doors connecting 10, 11 and 12 Downing Street have been thrown open in the wake of the Brown premiership. As one aide said: “We can do this, because the PM doesn’t hate his chancellor and vice versa.”
He has struck up a strong working relationship − which many see as blossoming into a friendship − with the chic Christine Lagarde of France. He could not have known when they first met that she was worth cultivating as a future head of the IMF. But it was striking to see the pair of them appear on Newsnight – after enjoying a private supper together – with the French finance minister supporting his decision to keep the UK out of the Greek bailout plan.
Osborne’s place in history depends on wiping out Britain’s deficit and securing private sector economic growth. Backing his own judgement is the first test.
George Pascoe-Watson is a partner at Portland Communications
George Osborne seeks his place in history
by George Pascoe-Watson / 26 Jun 2011
The chancellor is at the very heart of the coalition government, but his legacy depends not on his strong relationship with the prime minister, but with his ability to eliminate the deficit, says George Pascoe-Watson
Getty Images













Comments
christine williams / June 28 2011 2:32am
The way Mr Osbourne, The Chancellor, could have helped in wiping out Britain's deficit would have been to have done what Greece did with Kallikariti 2. They reduced local elected councillors by as much as 46% and as great as 90% and saved 1.2 billion Euros year end 2010/2011 to the state.
From my going door to door to door gathering petition signatures for Elected Mayor for Stafford Borough Council, it has been learnt that the public care not all that they do not know any of their local councillors, who rarely engage with the public and just problem-solve by committee. With councillors informing this Petition Organiser direct that they have got used to just talking with each other and not out with the public.
The public, in turn, laugh at the idea of a listening politician to their local concerns, not having experienced that themselves.
As many Borough Councillors are also Parish Councillors (who get no allowances) and are also County Councillors, who do get allowances, then there are far too many councillors still, despite a number seen on the internet saying that there are about 4,700 less councillor posts since the 1970s up to 2009. Wherever Tory councillors are today, they ask the Local Government Secretary Mr Pickles MP to help in reducing councils by a third of their councillors.
In Stafford Borough, there are 59 councillors for 26 Wards, yet for the whole of Staffordshire there are 62 county councillors (some of which are also Borough Councillors). Why not just 26 Councillors for the 26 Wards at Borough Council level?
This seems fair as most Wards only have a one third voter turnout, so should not the councillors be reduced by two thirds?
Nowhere is the merging of councils for back office support, resulting in less councillors. Why?
Does this seem fair when public sector jobs, which are peoples' wages, are being lost yet Councillors lose no wage and get multiple allowances by being on other council tiers as well?
No redundancy costs for having less Councillors, but for Stafford Borough savings on the one third of a million pound allowances each year, can be mirrored all over England and Wales.
Furthermore, if the Localism Bill had brought in Statutory Elected Mayors for all councils save Parish / Town Councils, resulting in that direct public elected post replacing all Councillors, with Elected Mayor, his/her Deputy Mayor and up to a maximum of 10 Assistant Mayor, the savings on local government might have saved many frontline services. And maybe brought more voters to the ballot box as well in the local elections of 2011?
But instead we have referendums in only 11 cities in 2012, which will go to Labour and not Tory nor Lib Dem, you can lay betting money on it.
I cannot fathom why a Tory government would pay for Labour to win? Why not have referendums throughout England and Wales and get Tories even in the north of England, where as councillors they have little chance of winning, if you are to spend a Tory government's funds in these dire economic times.
You can only 'sell' the idea of Elected Mayors, if it means less of the political class, at a time when jobs are being lost in the public sector and care of the old and vulnerable being curtailed due to deep cuts.
Petition Organiser Elected Mayor Stafford Borough Council website:
www.staffordshire-vote-english.info