"Calm down dear. Calm down and listen to the doctor."
And with that nod to Michael Winner, the prime minister became engulfed in a sexism row.
It all started quite innocently. Ed Miliband had a go at David Cameron for his "costly" health reforms.
Cameron replied that Miliband should be "constructive" instead of "frightening people" (basically citing the Bambi defence – 'If you can't say anything nice, don't say nothing at all')
Waiting times have gone up as millions are diverted to this costly reorganisation, declared Ed Miliband.
David Cameron retorted with a quote from Howard Stoate, a former Labour MP who is now a GP. Stoate has shown support for the coalition's healthcare reforms and believes GPs have overwhelming enthusiasm for helping shape service delivery.
Then it all started to go wrong.
Cameron claimed that Stoate had been defeated at the last election by a Conservative candidate, when, in fact, the Labour MP had stood down. A mis-brief from No 10 perhaps?
Angela Eagle, shadow chief secretary to the Treasury tried to point the mistake out to Cameron from across the floor. It was more of a heckle than a polite 'excuse me'.
"He stood down!" she shouted indignantly at the prime minister.
"Calm down dear," Cameron replied. "Calm down and listen to the doctor."
It could have been worse. He could have taken the Michael Winner persona a step further and started making allusions to her breasts (unlikely).
But Ed Balls was having none of it. He called on the prime minister to apologise to his colleague. From the colour of Balls' cheeks and the way he perched on the edge of his seat, he looked like he was close to punching some parliamentary procedure into Cameron's face.
"I said to calm down. I'll say it to you if you like," Cameron turned on Balls.
"I am not going to apologise. You do need to calm down," he added, although a little less assuredly.
At this moment, the Speaker waded in. "I think the prime minister has finished," Bercow said, cutting Cameron off.
The Speaker hurriedly called Bill Cash to speak (an unusual choice if his aim was to calm the chamber).
One Labour MP later called the incident "pure Bullingdon".
Ed Miliband's spokesman described it as "patronising, sexist and insulting".
Mumsnetters shrieked: "WTF?"
And Michael Winner? He tweeted that he's waiting for a private jet.
Puts it all in context, really.









Comments
Bradley Rogers / April 27 2011 5:32pm
He's got form! Look at Hansard for 12 December 2007, Column 309.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmhansrd/cm071212/debtext/71212-0005.htm#07121260001203
UK Fred / April 27 2011 7:13pm
Now if they said patronising toward a child pretending it were an adult, then I'd agree.
Chris O'Hare / April 27 2011 10:01pm
Is Milliband implying the eagle person is a woman, whatever next.
Andrew Zalotocky / April 27 2011 11:33pm
This idiotic row is a perfect demonstration of why PMQs is a total waste of time. The government and opposition trade juvenile insults. The backbenchers cheer and jeer like over-excited schoolchildren. The spin doctors desperately try to convince the media that their side won some kind of victory. None of it has any effect on the wider world other than to remind the majority of people why they don't have any respect for politicians.
wilhemina bothwell / April 28 2011 6:22am
Perfect example of how the heavy, boring lacrymose lefties take themselves SO seriously they have no sense of humour... How typical of the Po-faced Harriet to shove herself forward in this one!
wilhemina bothwell / April 28 2011 7:37am
Perfect example of how the heavy, boring lacrymose lefties take themselves SO seriously they have no sense of humour... How typical of the Po-faced Harriet to shove herself forward in this one!
mark / April 28 2011 8:25am
Perfect example of how the heavy, boring lacrymose lefties take themselves SO seriously they have no sense of humour... How typical of the Po-faced Harriet to shove herself forward in this one!
+1
Psi / April 28 2011 8:53am
I initially thought he was talking to Balls.
Would Labour have considered it sexist if it was directed at Balls?
If they would, it would be nice to know how they viewed it that way?
If they would not, then they are sexist, as they treat women and men differently in a forum where they are equal.
Storm in a tea cup.
Ken Hall / April 28 2011 9:34am
Great News that the economy is fixed, all discrimination has ended, there is no more crime, everyone has work, everyone is rich and healthy and happy and the world is full of unicorns and rainbows made of pure spun gold...
Or have labour completely lost the plot or what?
Kicking up a fuss over THIS? Really? The world must be a wonderful place now if this is what they are obsessing over today.
Because I remember when labour where in their death throws last year, we had an annual deficit the same size of a "black Wednesday" happening every single week. Now labour choose to get "offended" by a throw-away phrase?
Please let's never ever get those labour fools and clowns anywhere near the levers of power ever again.
Jules Wright / April 28 2011 9:48am
Strange how Red Miliband immediately burst out laughing. Like most people who saw it. Labour; oh dear. The funniest thing was seeing that madman Edward Testicles froth, gurn and bulge in apoplexy. Calm down, dear - it's only PMQs!
AndyN / April 28 2011 11:13am
Honestly, take a look at that Mumsnet thread - the foam-flecked, puce-cheeked outrage is absolutely hilarious.
Brett / May 02 2011 8:23am
Hilarious.
Can't wait 'till he says it to her again......