It was good to read full-throated advocacy of high speed rail (HS2) from Theresa Villiers (TP, February). She is right to stress the importance of cross-party backing for this vital strategic scheme. While Labour offers full support, we continue to call for ministers to provide certainty over the full route to the north by bringing forward a single hybrid bill, which could be done without delaying delivery of HS2 by one day. Will transport ministers also recognise the importance of consensus on aviation strategy, and take up Labour’s offer of cross-party talks?
Villiers says that she “understands public concerns about rail fares”, yet nowhere in her interview does she suggest there will be any relief from the planned two years of fare increases at three points above the retail price index. At a time when passengers are reeling from hikes of up to 13 per cent, that is not acceptable. The pain that hard-squeezed passengers felt this January could be nothing compared to the two Januaries to come.
John Woodcock MP
Shadow transport minister
Government spending has increased massively in recent years and we set up the TaxPayers’ Alliance because we felt that councils, quangos, government departments and the EU weren’t being properly scrutinised on spending. During the economic downturn, people became more acutely aware of just how big their tax had become for all that government spending, and how much that hit family budgets. We continue to be vocal opponents of government profligacy and have won the fight for spending transparency.
However, we now need to make that same argument on tax. The system is far too complex and opaque. Pay cheques convince ordinary taxpayers that they pay 20 per cent tax, by keeping national insurance separate when it’s simply another income tax. Transparency is the key to driving taxes down by exposing stealth taxes and leaving more money in the pockets of taxpayers, where it belongs.
Chairman, TaxPayers’ Alliance
Neil O’Brien’s uninformed dismissal of critics of government education policy, like myself, suggests that the Tory part of the coalition has no awareness of how divisive and unpopular its reforms have become (TP, February).
For all the talk of autonomy, we are seeing an unprecedented centralisation of education. Academies and free schools are touted as the only route to improvement despite growing evidence to the contrary. Parental choice is trumpeted until parents want something different from what the government wants. Any hint of criticism and out trots the cartoon stereotypes about ‘ideologues’ and ‘enemies of promise’ when, in fact, the opposition is coming from heads, teachers and parents around the country.
As for positive solutions, we need a strong, collaborative model with highly-qualified teachers, smaller classes, a broad and engaging curriculum, not to mention the crucial ability to bring all stakeholders along with you. Gove and company are failing miserably on almost every count.
Local Schools Network
The pick of online comments from TotalPolitics.com
Gawain Towler’s article on the rise of UKIP (TP, February) provoked a lively debate online this month. Mr McBeth said: “UKIP should strain every fibre and push every effort to split the Labour vote, otherwise it will not achieve enough pressure on these MPs in the wake of the Lib Dem collapse.” He went on to suggest that the party’s executive committee should be made “more representative of its members”. Mr Hudson added: “At last a party that wants to restore true democracy to the people rather than micro-control our existence.”
Charlotte Henry’s blog, Could Huhne become a Lib Dem king across the water? drew comment from Harry M, who disagreed with Charlotte’s assertion that the pool of Lib Dem talent to replace Huhne was small. “On talent in the party, well, there is Stephen Gilbert, Don Foster, Stephen Williams, Julian Huppert, Tom Brake, Martin Horwood, Tessa Munt & Duncan Hames to name a few,” he said.
Amber Elliott’s piece Hain: ‘the political party model is bust, in which the former Welsh secretary stated that “Labour is the only growing party at the present time”, angered Siôn Jones. He wrote: “This from the shadow secretary of state for Wales? Plaid Cymru has added 25 per cent to its membership in a few weeks, and the SNP add hundreds to its membership every time a unionist from London opens his mouth. It may not be important in London, but in Wales, where his constituency is, and whose people he is supposed to represent, it is highly significant. The constitutional question is the only one that is important at the moment. Hain shows that he is totally ignorant of the shape of things to come. How out of touch can a professional politician get?”
Gavin Devine’s exhortation on the blog to “cut the waffle on lobbying and get serious” attracted guarded approval from Mark Adams, who wrote: “I thought I would have to disagree with Gavin... However as I read further into the article, it seems Gavin is just being diplomatic – by the end, he clearly thinks the government’s proposals are almost as flawed as I do! Good on him.”
Chris Bruni-Lowe’s introduction to the People’s Pledge campaign (TP, November) has seen a surge of interest online as the campaign announced its first referendum. Tim Spencer wrote: “The problems we face are apathy and sheepism. A sheep will always follow the herd and vote for the same party regardless of the candidate or their policies. But it is a sensible idea to target the marginal constituencies first, where the thoughtful hold the balance of power.
Colin Martyn, however, was more sceptical about the campaign, saying: “I see nowhere on this site what safeguards are in place to protect the privacy of the list of provided names and emails. For example, how can I be sure that the list will not be sold to a publisher, or some other commercial enterprise that would then bug me to buy stuff?”