Tomorrow is the start of Labour’s National Policy Forum (NPF) where we will discuss the documents covering the range of Labour’s policies. If you’re at Warwick University this weekend, come and say hello!
The National Policy Forum is an innovation from the Neil Kinnock era. The first one took place in 1993, in Hammersmith, and it has met regularly ever since. It brings together Labour’s MPs, constituency activists and the affiliated organisations such as trade unions and the Fabians, and is modelled on some of the policy-making processes from our sister parties in Europe. The NPF was designed to allow a rolling programme of discussion about Labour’s programme, updating the policies in the light of circumstances and experience, and giving all of the parts of the Labour Party a say.
As an alternative to the old way of deciding policy - in secretive NEC committees and gladiatorial debates at the Labour Party Conference — it is a much-improved system. The legend of a Labour Chancellor Denis Healey having three minutes to explain the IMF deal to the Labour conference in Blackpool in 1976 shows how impractical the old system was. Until the 1990s, every single constituency Labour Party in the country combined had a vote of 10% of the Labour Party conference. Just imagine all of the earnest debates in constituency meetings all culminating in a conference where constituency activists had such a tiny proportion of the votes. So I am pleased that the NPF offers a much more inclusive way to make our policy.
That’s not to say the system cannot be improved. There’s some talk in the papers today comparing our session at Warwick University this weekend with the way Barack Obama is reaching out to new audiences in the USA. We should always be a bit wary of direct comparisons with the US, because of the differences in our political systems. But there is always something to be learned. One obvious lesson is the way US politicians have utilised the internet to engage people, canvass their views, raise funds, create local networks, mobilise supporters and get out the vote. Chris Hughes, a co-founder of Facebook is crafting Obama’s social networking strategy, using Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to create a profile of the candidate. I especially like his ‘fight the smears’ website
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/fightthesmearshome/
which allows Obama’s team to fight back when his opponents throw mud. You only have to think about how the Swiftboat campaign killed John Kerry’s hopes to know how important ‘rapid rebuttal’ is.
But what about policy development? I am still to see a really effective on-line policy development initiative. The parties have tried it, with varying degrees of success. Perhaps there is a council group out there which does on-line policy development for its manifesto? I would love to hear about it. I am convinced on-line policy discussion and development would engage more people and be more productive, but we are not there yet. Until we are, I guess it’ll be the National Policy Forum for another year.













Comments
John Hall / July 23 2008 3:26pm
Things like the NPF and Obama's anti-smear site are perfect examples of the decentralisation of British political parties, but I don't think we've gone nearly far enough over here.
We need more power placed in the hands of party members.
Adobemoma / June 16 2011 10:51pm
It is a special case..
Shettebag / July 04 2011 7:55am
This is everyone of the finest sites in this area. Look in here in many cases and promote to all, because it is hugely recommended. It is rare that the admin pages so cared for the treatment of believable information on the page and its layout.
kaylee625 / November 17 2011 8:14am
Hellow Guys .
We are doing two or three examples of website suitable geting a job.
cardinal website job search secure categories to the sectores in the industry after example Real Estate & Property
faulty website jobs search require registering.in smack i purposefulness know when i remmebred to do website that already sign up to the website as a replacement for benchmark http://habgalaxy.com/showthread.php?p=58037#post58037 the zalashim i resolve set forward to it is that more high-ranking over the extent of archetype http://reefsimple.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=743077 when getting thoroughly of the mouse blood you can do like this http://carbonxnation.info/index.php?topic=9385.new#new
Whttitney / November 25 2011 8:48am
If Jobs were not so talented, if he were not so visionary, if he were not so canny in determining where others had failed in producing great products and what was necessary to succeed, his pushiness and imperiousness would have made him a figure of mockery.
Throughout his career, he was fearless in his demands. He kicked aside the hoops that everyone else had to negotiate and straightforwardly and brazenly pursued what he wanted. When he got what he wanted something that occurred with astonishing frequency he accepted it as his birthright.
Pafeplaylab / December 16 2011 5:13pm
[url=http://www.uggssverigeonline.eu]ugg australia[/url]
ï»żEfter att ha flera domĂ€ner som har dessa exakt samma innehĂ„ll Ă€r fĂ„r inte nĂ„got du gömma kom frĂ„n dem. Observera det den Post Ă€ven samt illegala kunna vĂ€rva klick rĂ€tt frĂ„n ditt otroliga besökare antingen verbalt, samt genom att helt enkelt vĂ€g att din familj skriva.
,[url=http://www.uggssverigeonline.eu]ugg rea[/url]
ï»ż Denna Tidningen skriver Gingrich "har den typ av upptĂ€ck , nĂ„gon form av ledaregenskaper med visionen nĂ€r du behöver leda vissa land till dessa prövande tider " samt hyllade sin "innovativa och framĂ„tblickande strategi och sedan positivt ledarskap ".
[url=http://www.uggssverigeonline.eu]ugg rea[/url]
ï»żMilitĂ€ra tjĂ€nstemĂ€n frĂ„n Kabul sade rebeller i om Pakistan upplever samt anvĂ€nds tomma pakistanska grĂ€nsen baser att hjĂ€lpa dig skede attacker, som ibland kan innehĂ„ller varit alla arbetshypotesen inuti koalitionsstyrkorna som kallade inom bara allmĂ€nt flyganfall.
http://www.uggssverigeonline.eu