| « Iraq inquiry: What happens afterwards? | Regional round-up » |

Briefed only with an address, four MPs set out to see how the other half live in a new four-part series for Channel 4. Dispatched to different council estates across the country, Labour MP Austin Mitchell, Liberal Democrat MP Mark Oaten and Conservative MPs Tim Loughton and Iain Duncan Smith, who is later replaced by Nadine Dorries MP, are sent to experience life in council tower blocks for eight nights.
Although cynics among you may rightly ask how much somebody can learn about an alien way of life in eight days surrounded by a camera crew, these MPs do get stuck in.
In the first episode, broadcast on Monday, we watch as the four MPs are sent to their new homes for the next eight days. Mark Oaten, Tim Loughton and Iain Duncan Smith all seem to jump in with gusto – meeting their host families and swapping their designer suits, Oaten still wearing his Commons pass, for Primark t-shirts and Adidas hoodies. However, it is the Labour MP Austin Mitchell who is a little resistant, opting to live in a separate council flat with his wife rather than staying with local residents.
Mitchell also, instead of spending an evening with his first host decides to take his wife for dinner at a nearby friend’s house. Oaten meanwhile played bingo and Loughton went clubbing with his host.
Iain Duncan Smith was unfortunately only able to take part in the first day of filming as he had to return home due to his wife’s ill health. This is a real shame as he seemed one of the most passionate about the project. And the sight of the former Conservative Party leader in a hoodie joking with a group of young female residents about when he lost his virginity is the highlight of the show. However, Nadine Dorries is brought in over the next few episodes and I am sure she will be just as enthusiastic about the project.
All the MPs are shocked by the realities of everyday life on a council estate. Even Mitchell is astounded at just how rife the drug culture is when a morning stroll to the paper shop turns into a trip to the methadone drop-in centre.
These types of programmes are always going to border on the superficial but these MPs do get stuck in tackling drug and gang culture and trying to initiate a sense of community – Loughton hosts a community BBQ and football match and starts a local newsletter. Oaten even launches a petition to the council over the demolition of the tower blocks.
The MPs set out to educate themselves about the realities of living in a council tower block and they did just that. They discover what the real issues are for these people and what the residents would like done to improve their lives.
Interestingly the residents also benefitted as they were able to vent their anger, discuss issues that matter to them and engage in politics which many have never had the opportunity to do before. They also learnt about the role of an MP and were able to relate with each other.
Although Loughton and Dorries argue that their time in the tower block strengthened their belief in Broken Britain, all are optimistic about the future. If MPs and other politicians could really and genuinely engage with these people – instead of showing up for the 30 minute photo op – and restore trust and confidence, then these supposed ‘broken’ communities may start to re-engage with the rest of society and the political system.
I think that these MPs have shown that once the politicians take the first step then these communities will respond. Britain may be broken but it can still be fixed if the politicians are willing.
The Tower Block of Commons is on Channel 4 Monday at 9.00pm
5 comments
Austin Mitchell's biggest sin was not leaving the estate to go for a dinner with a friend (as bad as that was) - it was admitting that, until the programme, he'd thought that the drugs problem was "over-hyped"!! And he's been an MP for 35 YEARS!! Where's his head been?!
IDS - I thought started to come across well, so it's a shame (for his family and the health of his wife 1st) that he had to leave.
Mark Oaten - outside of seemingly breaking down in under 48 hours, he caused me such trauma by apparently being unable to dissuade a disaffected Labour voter from voting for the BNP - and acknowledging that he "needed to understand them more" before being able to come back to speak to like said voter. Sorry, WHAT'S YOUR JOB?! You don't understand your opposition, and you couldn't put a compelling case for your own party?! AND YOU WERE CONSIDERED A POSSIBLE LEADER FOR YOUR OWN PARTY?! Please someone tell me he was badly edited.
The only intelligent comment I heard was from Tim Loughton, who stated that the 23 year old single mum he was staying with was determined not to be dependent on the state and wanted to do the best for herself and her child...and that politician's need to understand what makes her different from so many others, and to see how this can be fostered in others. HEAR, HEAR.
Horrified that, as ClubSeal (!) says, the Tories and Lib Dems came out "best" in what should have been a Labour area of strength. Also shocked that they were all so unaware of what life for people at the bottom rung of the ladder is actually like - had it not been for this programme, is it acceptable that they would continue to have a say in major issues, whilst still being shrouded in such blind ignorance?! It was all vomit inducing and a stark reminder that the country is royally screwed.
As a taxpayer what I found more offensive was seeing what my tax money was spent on: tatts, drugs, dogs and sproggs.
Two women with how many children between them (7 was it) by how many absent fathers? And one of the mothers said that even she could work again she wouldn't.
In this scroungers paradise she has that choice. Its a shame I don't have the choice not to support her in that choice!!
This programme was a damning indictment of the failure of the welfare system of this and previous governments. At one point Austen Mitchell (?) was described as 'baby sitting the next generation of tower block residents' - or words to that effect. I'm sure that sgatement is true. And I'm equally sure that the diminishing next generation of tax-payers will pick up the burgeoning burden of their tatts, drugs, dogs and sproggs as well. And the cycle of despair grinds on.
The proble



