Surely it must be a cruel joke. Surely some silly adolescent at No10 has embarked on a foolish frolic of his own. Surely David Cameron is not going to back Peter Mandelson to run the World Trade Organisation?
Has the world gone mad? Am I in some drug induced trance? Was the Matrix right all along? Does Elvis live in a bungalow in Frinton?
I am beginning to wonder.
Of the fifty seven million people who inhabit our beautiful isles is there not someone, anyone, better placed to recommend than Mandelson? Yes, he’s clever, yes, he was a good minister, but (how can I put this politely?) he is a grade A, copper bottomed, shit. A man fuelled by poison, malice and revenge. A man who turned New Labour into a graveyard of those who stood in his way.
So if this nonsense is true. Why? What’s in it for Cameron? What’s in it for the coalition?
Over the last few months I have written a number of pieces about how Mandelson has been trying to slime his way into Cameron’s affections. It started in opposition with him slipping Osborne high grade and toxic gossip about Brown in Corfu. But clearly we have all had our eyes off the ball. The bloody man has been operating at Creeping Mach One without us noticing.
Has he been secretly dishing the dirt on MiliEd for snubbing him and suggesting he enjoys retirement? Is Cameron worried that he might bring the kiss of life to his flatlining Labour party? The former is possible as he always eats his own. The latter, just a pipe dream.
I honestly haven’t got a clue.
But to bring Mandelson back from the political dead like some grisly scene from Pet Cemetery would be an act of insanity. Firstly, brand Mandy isn’t exactly fresh, shiny and new. It is as ripe and gamey as pheasant that has been hanging by its legs for six months but more poisonous. Secondly, you sup with this guy with a very long spoon. He turned on Blair, Campbell, Brown and anyone else who has caused him displeasure.
And when the time comes, when it suits his purpose and particularly if the coalition looks wounded, he will be dripping poison about Cameron into whoever’s ear that can help him. It’s his nature.
I really do hope that this is all a bit of a ruse to destabilise Labour. But experience teaches us that government strategists are not as bloody clever as they think they are. This is the sort of stuff that political time bombs are made of.
And it will be a very dirty bomb, with toxic fallout spreading far and wide.
I really do hope this is all political piss and wind or a clever plot that even my cynical mind hasn’t fathomed.
However, I have a horrible sinking feeling that the seeds of a serious cock up might have been sown.
Batten down the hatches. It’s going to get rough.
Why is Cameron flirting with Mandelson?
by Jerry Hayes / 21 May 2011 11:58
If Cameron is really going to back Peter Mandelson to run the World Trade Organisation, it had better be part of a very clever plan. Otherwise it's going to come back to bite him in a truly spectacular fashion, says Jerry Hayes













Comments
Tim / May 21 2011 1:32pm
I think Cameron is taking a gamble, pure and simple. Mandelson was a fantastic EU Commissioner and it represents an opportunity for a British representative in a globally significant position. Why not take the risk? The Chinese apparently approached Mandelson as a compromise candidate in the first place, it would be a better move for the UK to make a deal with the BRIC's than back the Eurozone candidate who is hugely out of favour with anyone outside the EU/US and offers the UK nothing in return.
Jerry Hayes / May 21 2011 3:58pm
Tim, thanks for that. That explains an awful lot. If Cam blocks him and it goes out of Europe and Mandy leaks it it would make Cam look mean and petty. yo've made it all make sense now. However..........
Canning / May 22 2011 1:16pm
Cameron already looks mean and petty for blocking Brown going to the IMF. Why he would block Brown but support Mandelson is partly down to Mandelson's Tory-friendly persona and his strong relationship with a number of Cameron's circle, but also ideological: Brown is a Keynsian while Mandelson is a Thatcherite.
Tim Fettis / May 23 2011 7:32am
Yes Jerry there is still a huge risk attached to promoting Mandelson for the WTO position, whether Cam is willing to take that and whether it pays off is another thing entirely I suppose. Not sure I have made sense of it all, only an opinion. Personally I think Mandy could do a good job in the position so long as he tames his negative traits, which judging by his past, is hard to do. As you say, watch this space...
Kevin Crisp / May 24 2011 10:43pm
Isn't the WTO job an unimportant sinecure? Brown at the IMF could do real harm. Mandie at the WTO... who cares.