When the idea of legislation to clamp down on religious hatred first came up I was deeply uncomfortable about the idea. Not because I’m in favour of religious hatred, I’m not, but because it struck me as fundamentally disturbing that in an enlightened age we would choose to afford religion any particular protection over and above the protection we would afford to any other idea.

The decision to bring criminal charges against two BNP candidates for burning a copy of the Koran has placed the issue back on the public agenda. Unsurprisingly, feelings are mixed. From my own point of view I’m sickened by the idea of any book being burnt and by the BNP’s desire to divide communities through fear mongering and bigotry.

And yet, why should Islam, Christianity or any other religion for that matter be treated with special deference? Is religion any more valid or deserving of respect than, for example, scientific theories which, for some, undermine basic tenets of religious faith.

No doubt, my view of this subject is influenced by the fact I’m an atheist. But is it really any surprise that I find the protection of unproven doctrine strange?

Religion deserves respect. But it should be taken off its pedestal.

Tags: Burning, Quran, Religion