While the rest of Whitehall endures a civil service recruitment freeze the Department for Education is recruiting two new speechwriters to work closely with ministers. Aside from the issue of Michael Gove hiring while other departments slash experienced communications staff, whats the betting these new message-masters will be card-carrying Tories?
From burying bad news on 9/11 to smeargate, tales of naughtiness from New Labour's political appointees were legendary, leading to Conservative and Liberal Democrat pledges to reduce the number of so-called spin doctors. These crystallised as stronger controls, though not a hard cap, in the coalition agreement, with David Cameron asking each member of the cabinet to dispense with policy staff and recruit a single media-focused special adviser.
Front benchers will now be accustomed to the sometimes uneasy relationship with the civil service which lies somewhere on a spectrum between cautious and obstructive, depending on which ministerial memoir you are reading. This is compounded in a young administration by the often strong friendships between some civil servants and their former bosses, now languishing on opposition benches. Ministers need not wonder how that obscure but now embarrassing initiative found its way into the Question Book.
Mistrust of the civil service perhaps finds its most clear expression, again, with Michael Gove. The Tories flagship New Schools policy is not run out of DfE, having been outsourced (complete with 500,000 contract) to Gove's former political aide Rachel Wolf. Under pressure to drive through policy and constrained by a limit on recruitment, it is not surprising ministers would respond with increased attempts to shoe-horn partisans into supposedly non-political roles.
What we are left with is a dishonest compromise. For once, I agree with Tim Montgomerie: David Cameron should lift the ban on political appointments.
Let Cameron have his SpAds
by Laurence Durnan / 31 Mar 2011 17:00
The cap on hiring special advisers has resulted in a dishonest compromise - David Cameron should lift the ban on political appointments
Getty Images













Comments
David M / March 31 2011 9:33pm
Yes, he should have his SpAds. But only when he apologises for traducing SpAds in the first place. He made hay with attacking them for political convenience, remember, and as a former SpAd himself (one of only two jobs he ever did, I think, before becoming an MP - the other was doing PR for a second-rate TV company), he knows how useful they can be to a government, but was happy to ditch that for a cheap headline.
So, an apology first, then he can have his SpAds. Dave is a nice polite chap, who went to a good school and was well-brought up, he'll want to do the right thing, I'm sure.
anon / April 01 2011 10:22am
But the problem is that the SpAds they have are clearly not very good.
This government's political advice is based almost entirely on theory and not based in reality and it's even worse than the last one. For example, how many SpAds have ever even done their own tax return, yet most of them advise government on business taxes and deregulation!
On communication they're even worse. Failure to communicate on forests and the tuition fee cap quite literally led to riots in the streets!
It's in the interest of government and in the interest of the country to have excellent and varied advice going to Ministers and instead we have a bunch of ra-ra girls and public schoolboys with nicknames like "Spanky" running the show.
Yes, have SpAds, but please let's have some there on merit not on leaflets delivered in 2010 or Daddy's contributions to the governing party.